Why capitalism now needs ‘lockdowns’ (social enclosure) and ‘medical’ tyranny

Read Time:8 Minutes

Left Lockdown Sceptics hosts an excerpt of this excellent article by Ted Reese.

Because capitalism is working towards its own abolition by replacing commodity-producing labour with automated machines, the profitability of capital is increasingly dependent on low wages, public debt, state orders, and the centralisation of wealth and power.

Whether you believe that covid-19 broke out as a result of capitalism’s ever-greater need to turn the environment into commodities; [1] that the infection and death rates have been inflated by sleights of hand [2] to justify lockdowns and a profit-motivated vaccine arms race; that the outbreak was planned bioterrorism all along; or that there is no proof that covid-19 even exists as a novel virus (on the basis that it has apparently never been isolated,  see here also); one thing is undeniable: given the dire state of the world economy, the timing of the pandemic could not have been more convenient for the ruling class and the needs of capital accumulation.

Doubts about the severity or veracity of covid-19; and concerns about the safety and effectiveness of rushed vaccination programmes that cannot be smugly dismissed as anti-vaxxer hysteria [3] have been widely discussed and debated elsewhere. What has not been covered convincingly, at least widely, is an analysis of why the ruling class might have resorted to any conspiracy (or at least such a level of rank opportunism), and why now exactly (with the World Economic Forum speaking of a ‘Great Reset’; and one of its contributors anticipating an entirely rent-based economy whereby “you’ll own nothing and be happy”). What we tend to hear from those who do believe in a conspiracy is that it is all about grabs on power, land, and wealth. These grabs are certainly happening but stopping there does not get to the root of the issue. The root of the issue? The demands of capital accumulation.

Capitalism is a system that needs to keep expanding production to keep the accumulation of capital rising; to offset the general rate of profit’s tendency to fall (it trended down from an estimated 43% in the 1870s to 17% in the 2000s). The rate of profit trends downwards (and therefore historically towards zero) because in order to raise the productivity of commodity-producing labour (capital’s exploitation of which is the sole source of profit), the innovation required conversely tends to replace labour. The more capital-biased the ratio of capital-to-labour becomes, the more difficult it becomes for labour to reproduce and expand total capital yet further, yet the solution is to intensify the contradiction. The system suffers from a rising overaccumulation, or surplus, of capital, that which cannot be reinvested profitably in production.

Decade-by-decade average GDP growth rates in what the World Bank defines as ‘high income countries’ are trending towards zero.

Wages must be slashed to rewiden thinning profit margins, but the exploitability of labour continues to become increasingly insufficient to meet the ever-rising demands of accumulation. The centralisation of capital therefore becomes increasingly necessary (often through speculation). The bigger companies buy up smaller companies (preferably ones that have gone bust on the cheap) and monopolise industry. [4] And debt rises to ‘fill the gap’ left by the insufficient amount of surplus value that capital appropriates from workers and realises through commodity sales.

Capitalism has now entered its deepest ever crisis. A decade of savage austerity after the financial crash of 2007–09— enabling governments to redirect a large portion of public spending into subsidising capital — proved inadequate. Capital required a deeper depression. The lockdown induced, for example, Britain’s worst recession since 1709 (an economic contraction of around 30%, taking the size of the economy back to that of 2002, when the population was 59.24 million compared to 2019’s 66.65 million). Economic growth, which has slowed decade-on-decade for 50 years,[6] was already grinding to a halt — in August 2019, German’s economic growth was 0.1%; Britain’s 0.2% — before the hardest ever stock market crash on 19 February 2020.

Even before the financial crash, world debt had reached mountainous heights. It has since continued to hit new highs for so-called ‘peace time’ — the US, UK and Europe are of course waging endless wars on the Middle East and elsewhere — with the spending on the pandemic (subsidising capital; enforcing lockdowns) reaching world-war-like proportions. This is not just capitalism’s deepest ever crisis, though — the system is approaching its final crisis, since the contemporary innovation required to raise the productivity of labour — automation — is now conversely abolishing the source of profit, i.e. capital’s exploitation of commodity-producing labour.

The depth of the crisis of accumulation is such that the centralisation of capital is accelerating at an extraordinary pace. Capital’s dependence on public debt is reaching extreme highs. Monopoly capital has no choice but to make the state its number one customer if it is to remain profitable. This has always been true of weapons manufacturers, for example. Without capitalist states waging wars, weapons manufacturers cannot remain profitable, and so bogus justifications for wars (remember Saddam Hussein’s never-found weapons of mass destruction?) have to be dreamed up to retain enough support for the government of the day and capitalism in general from the general population.

Whether covid-19 is real or not, exaggerated or not, the same is now true of ‘Big Pharma’. Some 97% of the funding behind the Oxford/AstraZeneca vaccine came from public sources. The private pharmaceutical industry in the US has become so unprofitable that it has closed the bulk of its research & development facilities, relying instead on publicly funded state facilities. Big Pharma needed something like a state-mandated mass vaccination programme to remain profitable. Similarly, public education is being privatised, made dependent on ‘Big Tech’, another disaster for children and their privacy (their data being a treasure trove to sell on to marketing firms) after a year of denied education and social development.’

Click here to read in full…


[1] The World Wildlife Fund puts the spread of zoonotic diseases down to “the trade and consumption of high-risk wildlife; deforestation and conversion; expansion of agriculture and unsustainable intensification and animal production”. Monoculture contributes by denying animals the normality of co-evolving with nature, causing harmless microbes to transform into diseases. The outbreak is said to have come from bats in a wildlife market in Wuhan, China, but it is possible that China was just the first to report it — the virus is also said to have been present in the US a month beforehand (WSJ.com, 1 December). Some have pointed out that the Military Games took place in Wuhan in 2019.

[2] See Dr John Lee, “The way ‘covid deaths’ are being counted is a national scandal,” Spectator.co.uk, 28 May 2020; Iain Davis, UK Column, “Is covid-19 a hoax?, 21 February 2021; and “A deceptive construction — why we must question the covid-19 mortality statistics,” 28 March 2021.In April 2021 the official UK figure was suddenly reduced by some 23%.

[3] See, for example: “Will covid-19 vaccines save lives? Current trials aren’t designed to tell us”, British Medical Journal, 22 October; “Informed consent disclosure to vaccine trial subjects of risk of covid‐19 vaccines worsening clinical disease”, International Journal of Clinical Practice, 28 October; “Unlicensed vaccine manufacturers are immune from some, but not all, civil liability”, Full Fact, 4 September; “Victims of swine flu jab to get £60m payout”, TheTimes.co.uk, 2 March 2014.

An alleged cache of email exchanges between EU officials and the European Medicines Agency showed the drug regulator was uncomfortable about fast-tracking approval for the Pfizer and Moderna jabs (Le Monde, 18 January).

Accumulation demands a faster turnover and circulation of capital during economic crisis. The pressure on workers from management to ignore health and safety regulations therefore tends to rise. There is no reason to think this would not apply to vaccine production. When BBC Panorama exposed the cross-contamination of samples in a covid testing lab being ignored (thereby inflating positive test results), you had to wonder if workers on low-paid temporary contracts had been threatened with the sack if they reported cross-contamination.

(NB: I am not an anti-vaxxer, but remain sceptical in this case, especially when they are being so aggressively marketed to young, white-collar workers and their kids, i.e. the lowest risk demographic for a virus with an infection survival rate of 99.77%, rising to 99.95% for under-70s (according to this Stanford University/WHO meta-analysis, which says that, “If one could sample equally from all locations globally, the median infection fatality rate might even be substantially lower” since the fatality rate is lower among the younger populations of Africa and Asia); especially when the most vulnerable people it is supposed to protect are being thrown out of hospitals and into care homes, seeding the virus among the most vulnerable, while care homes are being starved of resources; and especially when the vaccines are being made by companies like Johnson & Johnson (a company wealthier than New Zealand or Hungary), which knew for decades that asbestos lurked in its Baby Powder. Indeed, the rollout of the J&J vaccine was suspended after six women aged 18–48 experienced blood clots.)

[4] The Myth of Capitalism: Monopolies and the Death of Competition (2018) by Jonathan Tepper and Denise Hearn found that: four corporations control 90% of American beer; four airlines completely dominate airline traffic, often enjoying complete local monopolies in their regional ‘hubs’; five banks control half of US banking assets; in many states, the top two insurance companies have 80–90% market share between them; 75% of US households can only access one monopoly provider for high-speed internet; four companies control the entire US beef market; three companies control both 70% of the global pesticide market and 80% of the US corn-seed market; Google’s share of internet search traffic is 90%; and so on. “The scale of mergers is so extreme,” write the idealist right-libertarian authors, “that you would almost think American capitalists were trying to prove Karl Marx right.” Wiley, New York, 2018, p. xv-10.

Notify of

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Robert McMaster
Robert McMaster
12 days ago

The medical-industrial complex has previously attempted several times to generate a virus pandemic crisis. SARS and Swineflu being two examples of trying to start a ‘panic’. To stampede politicans, whip up the media and frighten the public. In these and other cases the efforts did not manage ‘lift-off’. It is instructive to observe how these phoney campaigns evaporated. It certainly wasn’t because the presence of the claimed viruses declined. Or that the numbers of the so-called cases declined. And this tells a lot about this current incidence.

When this Covid business started up I, and any others who were faminliar with this racket immediately thought “Oh, here we go again”. Down a familiar road. How long before this one too would run out of gas. But in this case, powered by the muscle of fake news media, the panic took root. And once the criteria became established, the whole panic rides on its own momentum. And there are two necessary criteria. False positive PCR testing and the enforced designation of cause of death.

The political apparatus knows it is boxed in. They have no exit strategy. They cannot reverse course or apply by any means a path to gently wind the whole mess down. They have lost control of the situation and they really do not like this. Plus, a great many in the medical and scientific communities know that the claimed evidentiary basis is a fraud. And more of their ranks know that they have over-reached themselves and fear a coming backlash.

The only foreseeable way to smash this scam is by the mobilization of the public. Large scale resistance. Public defiance. And this is rising everywhere. You can see the hesitancy of many politicos and even the crap media. But, organizing the apparatus so that the public can come out and demonstrate – from scratch – is extremely challenging. And worse, the left has generally turned into total toadies of the government line to their eternal shame. In Ontario, the militants are Mennonites and libertarian fruitcakes. Though there are some staunch civil liberties veterans. I have personally challenged some of the established left groups to pitch in given they have experience and assets but they just clap their hands over their ears and run away. So, I will go after their members directly and to the sleeping masses of independent lefties.

All power to the worthy comrades who have established this site! Rock on.

12 days ago

I hate to say but we actually need more of that ayn rand selfishness spirit and strip down big government and liberty ideology at this point, i say this but i am still a believer in socialism, it just cannot be done with the crony fascist government in place so hence libertarianism makes sense at this point in time. better to join forces on what is agreed upon.. of course i wonder what’s the pure position of the libertarian about the k-3 to k-12 colonisation of the pupils data by our favourite philantropist Bill Gates (which will be imported to UK through common core programme)..

12 days ago
Reply to  Houssem

some things are out of bounds (healthcare, education), if we are gonna kill millions of people’s businesses then the pharma companies should chip in for the ‘war’ against the virus effort and not have any profits, most importantly they should have totally transparent protocols and genetic sequence for true scientific introspection by the widest possible community.. This is what being guided by science would have truly meant. Instead we are guided by Pfizer and moderna’s PR

Last edited 12 days ago by Houssem

[…] Why capitalism now needs ‘lockdowns’ (social enclosure) and ‘medical’ tyranny – Hvorfor kapitalismen nå trenger ‘lockdowns’ (sosial innhegning) og ‘medisinsk’ tyranni. 30 april 2021: Fordi kapitalismen jobber mot sin egen avskaffelse ved å erstatte råvareproduserende arbeidskraft med automatiserte maskiner, er kapitalens lønnsomhet i økende grad avhengig av lave lønninger, offentlig gjeld, statsordrer og sentralisering av rikdom og makt. Enten du tror at covid-19 brøt ut som et resultat av kapitalismens stadig større behov for å gjøre miljøet til varer; [1] at infeksjons- og dødsratene har blitt oppblåst av sleights of hand [2] for å rettferdiggjøre lockdowns og et lønnsmotivert våpenløp; at utbruddet var planlagt bioterrorisme hele tiden; eller at det ikke er noe bevis for at covid-19 til og med eksisterer som et nytt virus (på grunnlag av at det tilsynelatende aldri har blitt isolert, se her også); – en ting er ubestridelig: gitt den dårlige tilstanden til verdensøkonomien, kunne tidspunktet for pandemien ikke ha vært mer praktisk for den herskende klassen og behovet for kapitalakkumulering. Tvil om alvorlighetsgraden eller sannheten til covid-19; og bekymringer om sikkerheten og effektiviteten til forhastede vaksinasjonsprogrammer som ikke selvfornøyd kan avvises som anti-vaxxer-hysteri [3] har blitt diskutert og diskutert mye andre steder. Det som ikke har blitt dekket overbevisende, i det minste bredt, er en analyse av hvorfor den herskende klassen kunne ha brukt noen konspirasjon (eller i det minste et slikt nivå av rangopportunisme), og hvorfor akkurat nå (med World Economic Forum som snakker om en 'Great Reset', og en av bidragsyterne som forventer en helt leiebasert økonomi der "du vil ikke eie noe og være lykkelig"). Det vi pleier å høre fra de som tror på en sammensvergelse, er at det handler om å ta tak i makt, land og rikdom. Disse grepene skjer absolutt, men å stoppe der kommer ikke til roten til problemet. Roten til problemet? Kravene til kapitalakkumulering. Kapitalisme er et system som må fortsette å utvide produksjonen for å holde kapitalakkumuleringen økende; for å kompensere for den generelle profittens tendens til å falle (den gikk ned fra anslagsvis 43% på 1870-tallet til 17% på 2000-tallet). Frekvensen av profittrender nedover (og derfor historisk mot null) fordi for å øke produktiviteten til råvareproduserende arbeidskraft (kapitalens utnyttelse som er den eneste kilden til fortjeneste), har innovasjonen som kreves omvendt en tendens til å erstatte arbeidskraft. Jo mer kapital-partisk forholdet mellom kapital og arbeidskraft blir, jo vanskeligere blir det for arbeidskraft å reprodusere og utvide den totale kapitalen ytterligere, men løsningen er å intensivere motsetningen. Systemet lider under en økende overakkumulering, eller overskudd, av kapital, det som ikke kan reinvesteres lønnsomt i produksjonen.Gjennomsnittlig BNP-vekstrate i tiår for tiår i det Verdensbanken definerer som ‘høyinntektsland’ trender mot null. Lønningene må kuttes ned for å utvide tynne fortjenestemarginer, men arbeidskraftens utnyttbarhet fortsetter å bli stadig utilstrekkelig for å møte de stadig økende kravene til akkumulering. Sentraliseringen av kapital blir derfor stadig mer nødvendig (ofte gjennom spekulasjoner). De større selskapene kjøper opp mindre selskaper (helst de som har gått i stykker på det billige) og monopoliserer industrien. [4] Og gjeld stiger for å 'fylle gapet' etterlatt av den utilstrekkelige mengden merverdi som kapital tilegner seg arbeidere og realiserer gjennom varesalg. Kapitalismen har nå gått inn i sin dypeste krise noensinne. Et tiår med vill innstramming etter den økonomiske krasj 2007–09 – som gjorde det mulig for regjeringer å omdirigere en stor del av de offentlige utgiftene til subsidiering av kapital – viste seg å være utilstrekkelig. Kapital krevde en dypere depresjon. Lockdown induserte for eksempel Storbritannias verste lavkonjunktur siden 1709 (en økonomisk sammentrekning på rundt 30%, og tok størrelsen på økonomien tilbake til 2002, da befolkningen var 59,24 millioner sammenlignet med 2019s 66,65 millioner). Økonomisk vekst, som har avtatt tiår mot tiår i 50 år, [6] var allerede i ferd med å stoppe – i august 2019 var Tysklands økonomiske vekst 0,1%; Storbritannias 0,2% – før det hardeste aksjemarkedskrasj noensinne 19. februar 2020. Allerede før den økonomiske krasjen hadde verdensgjelden nådd fjellhøyder. Siden har den fortsatt å slå nye høydepunkter for såkalt 'fredstid'. USA, Storbritannia og Europa fører selvfølgelig uendelige kriger i Midtøsten og andre steder – med utgiftene til pandemien (subsidiering av kapital; håndheving av lockdown) når verdenskriglignende proporsjoner. Dette er ikke bare kapitalismens dypeste krise noensinne – systemet nærmer seg sin endelige krise, siden den moderne innovasjonen som kreves for å øke arbeidskraftens produktivitet – automatisering – nå avskaffer omvendt profittkilden, dvs. kapitalens utnyttelse av råvareproduserende arbeidskraft. Dybden i akkumuleringskrisen er slik at sentraliseringen av kapital akselererer i et ekstraordinært tempo. Kapitalens avhengighet av offentlig gjeld når ekstreme høyder. Monopolkapital har ikke noe annet valg enn å gjøre staten til sin første kunde hvis den skal være lønnsom. Dette har alltid vært tilfelle for eksempel våpenprodusenter. Uten at kapitalistiske stater fører kriger, kan ikke våpenprodusenter forbli lønnsomme, og slik skapes falske rettferdiggjørelser for kriger (husker du Saddam Husseins aldri gjenfunnede masseødeleggelsesvåpen?) Enten covid-19 er ekte eller ikke, overdrevet eller ikke, gjelder det samme for ‘Big Pharma’. Omtrent 97% av finansieringen bak Oxford / AstraZeneca-vaksinen kom fra offentlige kilder. Den private farmasøytiske industrien i USA har blitt så ulønnsom at den har stengt hovedtyngden av sine forsknings- og utviklingsanlegg og har i stedet satt sin lit til offentlig finansierte statlige anlegg. Big Pharma trengte noe sånt som et statlig mandat for massevaksinasjonsprogram for å være lønnsomt. Tilsvarende blir offentlig utdanning privatisert, gjort avhengig av 'Big Tech', en annen katastrofe for barn og deres privatliv (deres data er et skattkammer å selge videre til markedsføringsfirmaer) etter et år med nektet utdannelse og sosial utvikling. ' Klikk her for å lese i sin helhet … En påstått hurtigbuffer av e-postutveksling mellom EU-tjenestemenn og Det europeiske legemiddelkontoret viste at legemiddelregulatoren var ukomfortabel med hurtig utrulling av godkjenning av Pfizer og Moderna vaksiner (Le Monde, 18. januar). Akkumulering krever raskere omsetning og sirkulasjon av kapital under økonomisk krise. Trykket på arbeidstakere fra ledelsen om å ignorere helse- og sikkerhetsbestemmelsene har derfor en tendens til å øke. Det er ingen grunn til å tro at dette ikke vil gjelde for vaksineproduksjon. Da BBC Panorama avslørte krysskontaminering av prøver i et laboratorium for testet laboratorium som ble ignorert (og dermed økte positive testresultater), måtte man lure på om arbeidstakere med lavtlønnede midlertidige kontrakter ble truet med oppsigelser hvis de rapporterte om krysskontaminering. (NB: Jeg er ikke en anti-vaksiner, men er fortsatt skeptisk i dette tilfellet, spesielt når de blir så aggressivt markedsført til unge funksjonærer og barna deres, dvs. den demografiske risikoen med lavest risiko for et virus med en infeksjonsoverlevelsesrate på 99,77%, og steg til 99,95% for under 70-årene (ifølge denne metanalysen fra Stanford University / WHO, som sier at "Hvis man kunne prøve likt fra alle steder globalt, kan medianinfeksjonsdødeligheten til og med være betydelig lavere" siden dødsfallet er lavere blant de yngre befolkningene i Afrika og Asia); spesielt når de mest sårbare menneskene den skal beskytte blir kastet ut av sykehus og inn i omsorgsboliger, så viruset blant de mest utsatte, mens omsorgsboliger er blir sultet av ressurser, og spesielt når vaksinene blir laget av selskaper som Johnson & Johnson (et selskap som er rikere enn New Zealand eller Ungarn), som i flere tiår visste at asbest lurte i babypulveret. utrullingen av J & J-vaksinen ble suspendert etter at seks kvinner i alderen 18-48 år fikk blodpropp.) [4] The Myth of Capitalism: Monopolies and the Death of Competition (2018) av Jonathan Tepper og Denise Hearn fant at: fire selskaper kontrollerer 90% av amerikansk øl; fire flyselskaper dominerer flytrafikken fullstendig, og ofte nyter de komplette lokale monopol i sine regionale ‘nav’; fem banker kontrollerer halvparten av amerikanske bankaktiva; i mange stater har de to beste forsikringsselskapene 80–90% markedsandel mellom seg; 75% av amerikanske husholdninger har bare tilgang til en monopolleverandør for høyhastighetsinternett; fire selskaper kontrollerer hele det amerikanske biffmarkedet; tre selskaper kontrollerer både 70% av det globale pesticidmarkedet og 80% av det amerikanske maisfrømarkedet; Googles andel av søketrafikken på internett er 90%; og så videre. "Omfanget av fusjoner er så ekstremt," skriver de idealistiske høyre-libertariske forfatterne, "at du nesten skulle tro at amerikanske kapitalister prøvde å bevise Karl Marx rett." Wiley, New York, 2018, s. xv-10. https://leftlockdownsceptics.com/2021/04/why-capitalism-now-needs-lockdowns-social-enclosure-and-med… […]

Would love your thoughts, please comment.x